快盈彩票走势图|快盈彩票代理

来源：快盈彩票赔率2024-07-23 17:48

快盈彩票走势图

中央网信办：严肃查处网络炫富、宣扬暴饮暴食等问题******

　　中新网1月18日电据国家互联网信息办公室官方微信消息，为营造喜庆祥和的春节网上舆论氛围，中央网信办决定即日起开展为期1个月的“清朗·2023年春节网络环境整治”专项行动。此次专项行动开展时间为即日起至2月底，具体整治以下6方面：

　　——持续巩固“饭圈”治理成果，切实维护良好网络文娱生态。

　　一是密切关注春节晚会、春节档影视作品有关情况，整治借机挑唆粉丝群体互撕谩骂、攻击对立等问题，严防“饭圈”问题向体育、电竞等其他领域外溢。二是加强春节期间娱乐明星网上信息呈现规范管理，防止绯闻八卦、隐私爆料等信息占用公共平台资源。三是严禁网站平台借春节活动新设针对明星个人的榜单评选，不得变相诱导应援打榜。四是集中整治各类不良“网红”问题，严肃处置存在炒作劣迹行为史、刻意扮丑等问题的“网红”博主，查处炫耀服刑经历、美化服刑生活的所谓“励志网红”。

　　——严肃查处网络炫富、宣扬暴饮暴食等问题，避免不良风气反弹回潮。

　　一是集中清理借“天价年夜饭”“天价年终奖”“瀑布式压岁钱”“巨额红包”“顶级豪宅”“天价彩礼”等刻意炫耀奢侈生活的图文视频信息，不得恶意炒作隐形炫富、故意攀比等问题。二是排查处置刻意展示春节期间暴饮暴食、大吃大喝画面，宣扬铺张浪费的信息。

　　——集中查处组织实施网络赌博、网络诈骗等违法违规行为。

　　一是持续清理赌博引流信息，坚决关闭春节期间组织赌博交易的违法网站平台，严肃查处借棋牌类小游戏、夺宝游戏等名义或者利用建群发红包等功能变相从事网络赌博的行为。二是从严整治借“春运红包补贴”“春节集福”“有偿转让福卡”等名义实施网络诈骗问题，严防借“红包雨”“薅羊毛”等活动诱骗用户刷单。

　　——加大封建迷信和不良现象整治力度。

　　一是持续清理鼓吹炒作封建迷信陋习的帖文、视频信息，处置提供算命、占卜违规服务等问题。二是严管借低俗着装、露骨动作等方式，打造“酒店媛”“景点媛”“雪媛”“农媛”“外卖媛”等各类低俗人设，进行炒作引流的问题。

　　——严管网络欺凌、网络沉迷等问题，加大未成年人保护力度。

　　一是集中清理欺凌恶搞未成年人，或者诱导其从事危险动作的视频内容，持续整治利用“网红儿童”牟利等问题。二是严管利用儿童智能设备、网络游戏、游戏直播等渠道，向未成年人传播色情低俗、血腥暴力信息等问题。三是集中整治违规租号买号，鼓励家长主动为未成年人设置青少年模式，预防未成年人尤其是农村留守儿童沉迷网络。

　　——深入整治虚假信息等问题，防止渲染灰暗情绪。

　　一是重点整治春节期间涉经济民生、食品卫生、安全事故等领域造谣传谣行为，加大对突发谣言信息的辟谣力度，及时澄清事实。二是持续加大对涉疫网络谣言的整治力度，查处编造春节疫情走势、杜撰最新防疫政策、伪造抗病毒秘方、虚构病患经历等问题，防止误导公众，造成社会恐慌。三是从严查处炮制年终催债讨债、破产倒闭、哭穷卖惨等虚假情节，借演绎情感纠纷、有悖家庭伦理等低俗庸俗剧情，诱骗网民打赏消费等问题。四是严格管控借发布回乡笔记、返乡见闻等不实信息刻意煽动地域攻击、散布焦虑情绪、渲染社会阴暗面等问题。

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.